Know how competitive your tender is — before you submit it.
TenderIQ UK scores your draft against the published award criteria, shows exactly where you're losing marks, and coaches you to a stronger submission.
TenderIQ UK scores works tenders awarded on published quality and price criteria under the Procurement Act 2023. Each sub-sector has its own lens, standards and scoring discipline. Whether you bid every month or twice a year, it turns the hardest, most expensive part of winning work into the easiest.
Planned works, decarbonisation and occupied-site refurbishment — resident liaison, mobilisation, PAS 2035 and TOMs-aligned social value.
Schools and further education capital works — phased delivery around term time, safeguarding, DfE output specifications and handover.
NHS and care estate — clinical continuity, HTM/HBN compliance, infection control and works alongside live services.
Leisure, blue light, highways-adjacent and general public buildings — methodology, programme, resourcing and NEC contract mechanics.
The same engine, with the criteria, standards and language of the UK public construction estate built in — Procurement Act 2023, CCS, and the major framework routes.
Regional construction frameworks — methodology, programme, social value and KPIs.
NHS capital works — clinical continuity, HTM/HBN compliance, infection control.
Local authority housing, retrofit and planned works — resident liaison and mobilisation.
Crown Commercial Service works and design frameworks — award criteria and MI.
Rarely because the work isn't good enough. Usually because the response leaves marks on the table — and no one catches it until the standstill letter arrives.
The response talks around the criterion instead of addressing exactly what the evaluator asked.
A reusable method that isn't tied to this site, this contract, this employer's requirements.
Claims without the named projects, KPIs or references a panel can actually award marks for.
Strong content that breaches format rules and gets discounted or disqualified.
A Social Value response that isn't measurable, TOMs-aligned or contract-specific.
Discovering the weaknesses in the debrief, when nothing can be changed.
From first read to final check, every stage feeds the next. Nothing is re-keyed, nothing is lost, and nothing is scored against a generic template.
Drop in the ITT, employer's requirements, specifications, drawings, programmes, bills of quantities and any draft responses — PDF, Word, Excel, images or pasted text. TenderIQ reads them, builds a sourced project overview, and shows you exactly what it found and what it could not verify.
Record the criteria, weightings, word or page limits, and any stated minimums. TenderIQ applies the published marking scheme literally — not a generic rubric — and warns you when the framework adds up to more or less than 100%.
TenderIQ flags where the documents are silent, contradictory or ambiguous, and drafts the questions worth putting to the contracting authority before the deadline closes. No more realising the gap the day after submissions are due.
For each criterion, TenderIQ generates a response brief grounded in your documents, then writes a first draft in the right structure, tone and page budget. Anything only you can supply is marked [USER INPUT REQUIRED], so you own the final answer.
Paste or upload your finished responses and TenderIQ marks them the way the panel will — band by band, criterion by criterion, with the quality-versus-price competitiveness read. Not a flattering number. The honest one, while you can still act on it.
A final mechanical sweep across every response: unanswered requirements, placeholders left in the text, contradictions between answers, and evidence gaps. Fix the easy losses before the deadline, not after.
The only tool that takes you the whole way — read, questioned, briefed, drafted, marked and checked. Honest-model guardrail: no win probability, no ranking, no competitor position, no recommended price band — anywhere in the product.
Every other tool tells you your bid is great. Your bid isn't great until the evaluator says so — and by then it's too late to change it. TenderIQ UK scores the way the panel scores: it counts reservations, it won't be flattered by good writing, and it never invents evidence you don't have. It tells you the truth about your bid while you can still act on it. That's the whole point.
TenderIQ UK isn't one general model given a clever instruction. It's a register of individually trained skills — each one taught a single discipline of tender work, each one applied at the point in the process where it matters. Eight run the pipeline from intake to final check. Eight more are the specialist lenses a panel marks against.
Each skill is versioned and governed by a written specification — so the same submission is read the same way today, next month and next year.
Most UK public tenders score quality relative to the best submission — which no tool can see. So TenderIQ scores what you control, and lets you model the rest.
The marks your response earns on each criterion, against the rubric. Locked — the only way to move it is to improve the response.
You set where the strongest competing response likely lands, and your price versus the lowest. Your call, your knowledge of the market.
Quality scored relative to the best tender, plus your price — combined into an indicative total that updates as you improve.
We never claim to predict who wins. There's no fabricated win probability and no invented ranking — because we can't see your competitors' bids, and we won't pretend to.
TenderIQ UK is launching with a founding group of regional main contractors and specialist sub-contractors. Because it scores consistently, the improvement is measurable. (Illustrative founding-cohort examples.)
"It caught a whole criterion we'd half-answered. The rewrite guidance took our Programme section from a pass to genuinely strong."
"The value is seeing where you lose marks before the panel does. We stopped guessing and started fixing the right things."
"Consistent scoring meant I could trust the before/after. I could show the team exactly why a section improved."
Per-criterion scoring with the exact gaps quoted from your own response.
The engine reads your project first, so it judges the response in context.
Grounded before/after rewrites you can act on, not vague suggestions.
Errors, omissions and format breaches surfaced before you submit.
A content vault so your strongest examples are always to hand.
The same 9-band rubric applied the same way — so improvement is measurable.
Senior bid manager · £1,500–£5,000 · 2–3 days · one opinion.
Hundreds of pounds per report · one snapshot · no revision loop.
Under 60 seconds per evaluation · revise and re-score as often as needed.
Independence. The AI that wrote your bid can't mark it. TenderIQ evaluates whatever you wrote, wherever you wrote it — and never writes for you.
Provenance. Coaching authored by working procurement professionals and calibrated against real assessment summaries. Our accuracy record is published and updated by re-measurement, never by rounding up.
Priced against what it replaces — consultant reviews at £1,500–£5,000 and per-report AI reviews at hundreds of pounds per snapshot. One month of TenderIQ costs a fraction of one external review and includes the full revise-and-re-score loop.
No. TenderIQ drafts responses grounded in your ITT and project documents, but anything only you can supply — names, dates, case studies, prices — is marked [USER INPUT REQUIRED]. You fill those in, then take the final text to the Responses page to be scored.
The ITT, employer's requirements, specifications, drawings, programmes, pre-start forms and your draft responses — as PDF, Word, Excel, images, or pasted text. Each tender has a 500 MB / 50-file limit and documents are wiped 60 days after upload.
Yes. TenderIQ reads the documents for silent, contradictory or ambiguous points and drafts the clarification questions worth raising before the query deadline closes — not after.
The AI classifies your response against each published criterion, then deterministic code applies the marking scheme, length limits and thresholds. The model never emits the score — it classifies, the engine scores.
It scans for unanswered requirements, leftover placeholders, contradictions between responses, and missing evidence — so you fix the easy losses before submission.
Yes. Your documents and responses are private to your organisation, encrypted at rest and in transit, and never used to train shared models.
UK public construction works, frameworks and one-off procurements — typically in the £500k–£10m range. It covers routes such as Pagabo, ProCure23, LHC, Fusion21, YPO and direct authority ITTs.
No. TenderIQ coaches you through each phase. You bring the project knowledge; it brings the procurement structure, scoring logic and drafting discipline.
Yes — the Professional plan includes unlimited users, so your bid team, estimators and site leads can work from the same projects and evidence.
One plan — TenderIQ Professional — unlimited under fair use. Your first tender is free with no card required. Cancel anytime.
Know how competitive your tender is — before you submit it.
Start Your First Tender — Free